Barack Obama on Blogger

Made by BloggerTemplates.Itmag.org

Friday, January 16, 2009

Car Of Barack Obama















It looks like something out of a James Bond film.



But the presidential seal on the side marks this hulking limo out as something not even the superspy will be able to get his hands on.
These are the first pictures of the new armoured limousine which will be used to ferry Barack Obama around.
Nicknamed "The Beast", the Cadillac will make its debut on 20 January, as part of the inaugural parade.
It is traditional to show presidential cars off for the first time in this way.
'State of the art'
The Secret Service said the 2009 limo would provide it with a "valuable asset" in providing its occupant with the highest level of protection.
As expected, they are not giving too much away about the car, but Nicholas Trotta, their Assistant Director for the Office of Protective Operations is quoted in their news release:
"Although many of the vehicle's security enhancements cannot be discussed, it is safe to say that this car's security and coded communications systems make it the most technologically advanced protection vehicle in the world."
Observers say the car is likely to include bullet proof glass, an armoured body, a separate oxygen supply, and a completely sealed interior to protect against a chemical attack.
Some joke the car is so tough it could withstand a rocket-propelled grenade. Its tyres are said to work flat, so the vehicle will keep going even if shot at.
While the car's interior is a closely guarded secret, there is no doubt "The Beast" has been kitted out with the best and most up-to-date equipment.
David Caldwell, a spokesman for General Motors which makes Cadillac, told the BBC that the car is made to specifications that the company is given by the federal government.
"One of the specifications is that we don't talk about the specifications," he said.
But Mr Caldwell did reveal that the car has been made in keeping with the design of a contemporary Cadillac, and would include a hand-crafted interior.
When asked if it included such extras as an iPod dock, he said he could not comment specifically, but added that the limo would have "state of the art electronics".

Thursday, January 8, 2009

How Barack Obama learned to love Israel



I first met Democratic presidential hopeful Senator Barack Obama almost ten years ago when, as my representative in the Illinois state senate, he came to speak at the University of Chicago. He impressed me as progressive, intelligent and charismatic. I distinctly remember thinking 'if only a man of this calibre could become president one day.'On Friday Obama gave a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Chicago. It had been much anticipated in American Jewish political circles which buzzed about his intensive efforts to woo wealthy pro-Israel campaign donors who up to now have generally leaned towards his main rival Senator Hillary Clinton.Reviewing the speech, Ha'aretz Washington correspondent Shmuel Rosner concluded that Obama "sounded as strong as Clinton, as supportive as Bush, as friendly as Giuliani. At least rhetorically, Obama passed any test anyone might have wanted him to pass. So, he is pro-Israel. Period."Israel is "our strongest ally in the region and its only established democracy," Obama said, assuring his audience that "we must preserve our total commitment to our unique defense relationship with Israel by fully funding military assistance and continuing work on the Arrow and related missile defense programs." Such advanced multi-billion dollar systems he asserted, would help Israel "deter missile attacks from as far as Tehran and as close as Gaza." As if the starved, besieged and traumatized population of Gaza are about to develop intercontinental ballistic missiles. Obama offered not a single word of criticism of Israel, of its relentless settlement and wall construction, of the closures that make life unlivable for millions of Palestinians.There was no comfort for the hundreds of thousands of people in Gaza who live in the dark, or the patients who cannot get dialysis, because of what Israeli human rights group B'Tselem termed "one cold, calculated decision, made by Israel's prime minister, defense minister, and IDF chief of staff" last summer to bomb the only power plant in Gaza," a decision that "had nothing to do with the attempts to achieve [the] release [of a captured soldier] nor any other military need." It was a gratuitous war crime, one of many condemned by human rights organizations, against an occupied civilian population who under the Fourth Geneva Convention Israel is obligated to protect.




From left to right, Michelle Obama, then Illinois state senator Barack Obama, Columbia University Professor Edward Said and Mariam Said at a May 1998 Arab community event in Chicago at which Edward Said gave the keynote speech. (Image from archives of Ali Abunimah) While constantly emphasizing his concern about the threat Israelis face from Palestinians, Obama said nothing about the exponentially more lethal threat Israelis present to Palestinians. In 2006, according to B'Tselem, Israeli occupation forces killed 660 Palestinians of whom 141 were children -- triple the death toll for 2005. In the same period, 23 Israelis were killed by Palestinians, half the number of 2005 (by contrast, 500 Israelis die each year in road accidents).But Obama was not entirely insensitive to ordinary lives. He recalled a January 2006 visit to the Israeli town of Kiryat Shmona that resembled an ordinary American suburb where he could imagine the sounds of Israeli children at "joyful play just like my own daughters." He saw a home the Israelis told him was damaged by a Hizbullah rocket (no one had been hurt in the incident).Six months later, Obama said, "Hizbullah launched four thousand rocket attacks just like the one that destroyed the home in Kiryat Shmona, and kidnapped Israeli service members."Obama's phrasing suggests that Hizbullah launched thousands of rockets in an unprovoked attack, but it's a complete distortion. Throughout his speech he showed a worrying propensity to present discredited propaganda as fact. As anyone who checks the chronology of last summer's Lebanon war will easily discover, Hizbullah only launched lethal barrages of rockets against Israeli towns and cities after Israel had heavily bombed civilian neighborhoods in Lebanon killing hundreds of civilians, many fleeing the Israeli onslaught. Obama excoriated Hizbullah for using "innocent people as shields." Indeed, after dozens of civilians were massacred in an Israeli air attack on Qana on July 30, Israel "initially claimed that the military targeted the house because Hezbollah fighters had fired rockets from the area," according to an August 2 statement from Human Rights Watch. The statement added: "Human Rights Watch researchers who visited Qana on July 31, the day after the attack, did not find any destroyed military equipment in or near the home. Similarly, none of the dozens of international journalists, rescue workers and international observers who visited Qana on July 30 and 31 reported seeing any evidence of Hezbollah military presence in or around the home. Rescue workers recovered no bodies of apparent Hezbollah fighters from inside or near the building." The Israelis subsequently changed their story, and neither in Qana, nor anywhere else did Israel ever present, or international investigators ever find evidence to support the claim Hizbullah had a policy of using civilians as human shields. In total, forty-three Israeli civilians were killed by Hizbullah rockets during the thirty-four day war. For every Israeli civilian who died, over twenty-five Lebanese civilians were killed by indiscriminate Israeli bombing -- over one thousand in total, a third of them children. Even the Bush administration recently criticized Israel's use of cluster bombs against Lebanese civilians. But Obama defended Israel's assault on Lebanon as an exercise of its "legitimate right to defend itself."There was absolutely nothing in Obama's speech that deviated from the hardline consensus underpinning US policy in the region. Echoing the sort of exaggeration and alarmism that got the United States into the Iraq war, he called Iran "one of the greatest threats to the United States, to Israel, and world peace." While advocating "tough" diplomacy with Iran he confirmed that "we should take no option, including military action, off the table." He opposed a Palestinian unity government between Hamas and Fatah and insisted "we must maintain the isolation of Hamas" until it meets the Quartet's one-sided conditions. He said Hizbullah, which represents millions of Lebanon's disenfranchised and excluded, "threatened the fledgling movement for democracy" and blamed it for "engulf[ing] that entire nation in violence and conflict."Over the years since I first saw Obama speak I met him about half a dozen times, often at Palestinian and Arab-American community events in Chicago including a May 1998 community fundraiser at which Edward Said was the keynote speaker. In 2000, when Obama unsuccessfully ran for Congress I heard him speak at a campaign fundraiser hosted by a University of Chicago professor. On that occasion and others Obama was forthright in his criticism of US policy and his call for an even-handed approach to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The last time I spoke to Obama was in the winter of 2004 at a gathering in Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood. He was in the midst of a primary campaign to secure the Democratic nomination for the United States Senate seat he now occupies. But at that time polls showed him trailing.As he came in from the cold and took off his coat, I went up to greet him. He responded warmly, and volunteered, "Hey, I'm sorry I haven't said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race. I'm hoping when things calm down I can be more up front." He referred to my activism, including columns I was contributing to the The Chicago Tribune critical of Israeli and US policy, "Keep up the good work!"But Obama's gradual shift into the AIPAC camp had begun as early as 2002 as he planned his move from small time Illinois politics to the national scene. In 2003, Forward reported on how he had "been courting the pro-Israel constituency." He co-sponsored an amendment to the Illinois Pension Code allowing the state of Illinois to lend money to the Israeli government. Among his early backers was Penny Pritzker -- now his national campaign finance chair -- scion of the liberal but staunchly Zionist family that owns the Hyatt hotel chain. (The Hyatt Regency hotel on Mount Scopus was built on land forcibly expropriated from Palestinian owners after Israel occupied East Jerusalem in 1967). He has also appointed several prominent pro-Israel advisors.

Michelle Obama and Barack Obama listen to Professor Edward Said give the keynote address at an Arab community event in Chicago, May 1998. (Photo: Ali Abunimah) Obama has also been close to some prominent Arab Americans, and has received their best advice. His decisive trajectory reinforces a lesson that politically weak constituencies have learned many times: access to people with power alone does not translate into influence over policy. Money and votes, but especially money, channelled through sophisticated and coordinated networks that can "bundle" small donations into million dollar chunks are what buy influence on policy. Currently, advocates of Palestinian rights are very far from having such networks at their disposal. Unless they go out and do the hard work to build them, or to support meaningful campaign finance reform, whispering in the ears of politicians will have little impact. (For what it's worth, I did my part. I recently met with Obama's legislative aide, and wrote to Obama urging a more balanced policy towards Palestine.)If disappointing, given his historically close relations to Palestinian-Americans, Obama's about-face is not surprising. He is merely doing what he thinks is necessary to get elected and he will continue doing it as long as it keeps him in power. Palestinian-Americans are in the same position as civil libertarians who watched with dismay as Obama voted to reauthorize the USA Patriot Act, or immigrant rights advocates who were horrified as he voted in favor of a Republican bill to authorize the construction of a 700-mile fence on the border with Mexico.Only if enough people know what Obama and his competitors stand for, and organize to compel them to pay attention to their concerns can there be any hope of altering the disastrous course of US policy in the Middle East. It is at best a very long-term project that cannot substitute for support for the growing campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions needed to hold Israel accountable for its escalating violence and solidifying apartheid.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Future Plan Of Barack Obama




INVESTING IN AMERICA’S FUTURE
BARACK OBAMA AND JOE BIDEN’S PLAN FOR SCIENCE AND INNOVATION





Barack Obama and Joe Biden understand that critical national goals can only be met if we renew ourcommitment to science, technology and innovation. Investments in science and technology foster economic growth; create millions of high-tech, high-wage jobs that allow Americanworkers to lead the global economy;improve the quality of life for all Americans; and strengthen our national security. Clean energy technologiescan help end our dependence on foreign oil and combat global warming. Advances in biomedical research candeliver new life-saving ways to diagnose, prevent and treat diseases. And the urge to probe more deeply intothe unknown and expand the frontiers of human knowledge is at the core of the American experience.The U.S. faces unprecedented competition from countries such as China and India that are determinednot
simply to produce low-cost products and services, but to be at the forefront of developing technologies.


America needs a president who understands these challenges and is prepared to make the most of theopportunities they present. We need to end the Bush administration’s war on science where ideology trumpsscientific inquiry and politics replaces expert opinion. As president,Barack Obama will lead a new era of scientific innovation in America by:





•Restoring integrity to U.S. science policy to ensure that decisions that can be informed by science are
made on the basis of the strongest possible evidence.
• Doubling over a 10 year period the federal investment in basic research by key science agencies,
with a special emphasis on supporting young researchers at the beginning of their careers, and backing
high-risk, high-return research.
• Making a national commitment to science education and training by recruiting some of America’s
best minds to teach K-12 math and science and by tripling the number of the National Science
Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowships.
• Encouraging American innovation to flourish by making the R&D tax credit permanent, streamlining
our patent system, eliminating the capital gains tax on start-ups and small businesses, and promoting the
deployment of next-generation broadband networks.
• Addressing the “grand challenges” of the 21st century through accelerating the transition to a lowcarbon,
oil-free economy, enabling all Americans to live longer and healthier lives, and protecting our
country from emerging threats to our national security.

The qualifications campaign:real vulnerability



Is being black hurting Barack Obama in his run for President?

Well, something is hurting him, because he's not where he should be in the polls. Given the unpopularity of Bush and the state of the economy, a Democratic candidate should have a much larger lead than Obama's current spread of 3% over John McCain in the Real Clear Politics average of all polls.

Could simple racism be the explanation?

Unlikely. John McCain, an authentic war hero and a determined, media-savvy campaigner, would be a formidable opponent in any year. More than any other Republican, McCain is tough to link to Bush, given his maverick reputation.
But race appears to be playing a role - and in an unlikely way.
Since the 1930s, Gallup has been asking Americans if they would vote for a qualified black candidate for President. The good news is that the percentage of Americans who say yes has risen from well below half of us to just over 90%. Still, about 8% say they would never support a black candidate for the presidency. Given what we know from 80 years of studying how prejudice works, if 8% are willing to admit to racism in a poll, the real number may well be twice as large.
But Obama's problem with race goes much deeper than that small slice of the public that's adamantly against a black President. Obama, as a black man, is particularly vulnerable to a challenge to his qualifications.
Unqualified blacks getting into high positions reminds some white voters of the worst stereotypes of affirmative action.
Even the mere mention of affirmative action is so powerful that it can activate white prejudice. In a national split sample of white voters, half of the sample was asked their opinion about affirmative action prior to being asked a short battery of standard questions about prejudice. The other half was assessed on prejudice first. Whites who merely heard the phrase "affirmative action" first were more likely than other whites to think that blacks were violent, less intelligent and lazy.
This is why the McCain ads that focus on Obama's short résumé are so brilliant. While only a small portion of the white electorate is unwilling to vote for a qualified black candidate, a much larger percentage of whites resent it when they feel blacks are getting promoted faster because of race.
If the Republicans can subtly portray Obama as an affirmative-action nominee, McCain could well be our next President.
Defenders of McCain will argue that the attacks on Obama's scant résumé are not racial at all, that Republicans would run the same ads against a white candidate with a similar background. And it is true that Obama, if elected, would have less experience in national and international politics than any President since Lincoln. A Democratic Party that questioned George Bush's qualifications in 2000 as a two-term governor of Texas cannot easily claim that it is racist to ask Americans to compare Obama's experience to McCain's.
Still, ads about qualifications hurt Obama more than they would a white candidate, because they remind some white voters of affirmative action. That's simply how white opinion works on this issue.
Of course, McCain cannot be seen in any way to be using race against Obama directly. We know that many white voters try to maintain their "egalitarian self-concept," which is their image of themselves as nonracist and fair. Many whites want to vote for a black candidate for just that reason: to help balance out the anti-black tendencies in the electorate.

Family Of Barack Obama




Barack Obama
Barack Obama was born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii. He is currently President-elect of the United States.[5]





Malia, Michelle and Sasha on stage at the 2008 Democratic National Convention
Michelle Obama, née Robinson, the wife of Barack Obama, was born on January 17, 1964 in Chicago, Illinois. She is a lawyer and was a University of Chicago Hospital Vice-President. She will be First Lady of the United States.



Malia and Sasha Obama



Barack and Michelle Obama have two daughters, Malia Ann and Natasha. Malia (pronounced /məˈliːə/) was born in 1998 and Natasha (known as Sasha, /ˈsɑːʃə/) was born in 2001. Sasha will be the youngest resident of the White House since John F. Kennedy, Jr. arrived as an infant in 1961. They keep busy schedules, as the Associated Press reports: "soccer, dance and drama for Malia, gymnastics and tap for Sasha, piano and tennis for both."[6][7] They both gave an interview to the television series, Access Hollywood, which President-elect Obama regretted allowing.[8]
In his victory speech on the night of his election, President-elect Obama promised Sasha and Malia a puppy to take with them to the White House.[9] Selection of a dog was complicated by the fact that Malia is allergic to animal dander.[10] It was announced on November 21, 2008 that Sasha and Malia will be attending the private Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, the same school as attended by Chelsea Clinton, Tricia Nixon Cox, and Archibald Roosevelt. They began classes there on January 5, 2009.[11] While in Chicago, both attended the private University of Chicago Laboratory School. Sidwell is also where the grandchildren of Joe Biden attend school.[12]



Marian Shields Robinson



Michelle Obama's mother (birthname Marian Shields, born July 1937), now widowed, married Michelle's father, Fraser Robinson in 1960.[13][14] Robinson formerly was a secretary at Spiegel catalog and a bank. While Michelle and Barack Obama were campaigning in 2008, Robinson tended the Obama's young children, and will continue to live nearby when the Obamas officially move into the White House in 2009; and were Robinson to elect to move into the executive mansion itself, she would be the first live-in grandmother there since Minnie Doud during the Eisenhower administration and Madge Wallace during the Truman administration.
Right-to-left: Barack Obama and Maya Soetoro with their mother Ann Dunham and grandfather Stanley Dunham in Hawaii (early 1970s)

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

History Of Barack Obama







Barack Obama



began work in earnest yesterday, twisting arms and stroking egos in Congress to garner support for a planned $775 billion (£525 billion) recovery plan for an economy that he described as “very sick”.
On his first full day back in Washington since the election, the President-elect dispatched his daughters to their new school before heading to Capitol Hill to prepare for one of the most difficult inheritances faced by an incoming president.
At every turn yesterday, he underlined the gravity of the crisis and the need for national unity. After speaking with his economic team, he declared: “The situation is getting worse. We have to act and act now to break the momentum of this recession.”
Later, meeting with Congressional leaders from both parties, he said: “We are in one of those periods in American history where we don’t have Republican or Democratic problems, we have American problems. My commitment as the incoming president is going to be to reach out across the aisle to both chambers to listen and not just talk, to not just try to dictate but try to create a partnership.”



In an effort to appease Republicans and some conservative Democrats worried about the growth of public spending, Mr Obama’s aides have disclosed that the package will include about $300 billion of tax cuts for middle-class workers and businesses. They also suggested that he would propose long-term “radical reforms” to rein in a federal deficit projected to reach trillions over coming years.
Although the Democrats have majorities in both Houses, Republicans would still be able to muster enough votes to block or delay the spending programme which, they fear, heralds a new era of wasteful “big government”.
Hopes that a Bill could be ready for Mr Obama to sign into law on January 20, the day of his inauguration, have dissipated after Republican leaders signalled that they would not be rushed into agreeing any deal until next month at the earliest.
On his flight from Chicago to Washington on Sunday, Mr Obama allowed himself to glance back at the life he leaves behind, admitting that he had “choked up a little bit” over leaving his family home for an inauguration this month when — more than at any time in the past 50 years — there is such a heavy weight of expectation bearing down on the new president.
His press secretary, Robert Gibbs, was grimly focusing on the task ahead. He conceded that Congressional scepticism towards the spending programme made it “very, very unlikely” that the Bill would be passed within the coming fortnight.
Mr Obama was yesterday at pains to emphasise that he intended to be responsible and transparent over how money was spent. “It’s not going to be sufficient for us to fall back into the old Washington ways and simply throw money at the problem,” he said.
He added, however, that the American people expected leaders to “share the same sense of urgency that I do — we’re going to move quickly and not going to get bogged down by old-style politics on either side”.
Mr Obama indicated that he still wanted to speed the recovery programme through Congress, saying: “I expect to sign a Bill for creating three million jobs for the American people shortly after taking office.” When pressed for a precise timetable, he replied: “The end of January or the first week of February.”
Previous presidents have seen policies halted because of poor relations with Congress and Mr Obama’s two-year economic stimulus plan will be an early test of his campaign theme of transcending partisan political divisions.
Aides say that he does not want the bare minimum of 60 senators needed to overcome filibuster blocking tactics. Instead, they say, he is seeking at least 80 votes, indicating genuine cross- party support for the programme.
Some of the shine surrounding the new administration, however, has come off in recent weeks, with scandal swirling around the alleged attempt by the Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich to sell Mr Obama’s vacant Senate seat.
Yesterday Roland Burris, the black politician picked by the Governor to replace Mr Obama, left Chicago for Washington, insisting that he would be taking up the seat even though Democrats have vowed to block his appointment. “I don’t have to separate myself from Rod Blagojevich,” he said. “This is all politics and theatre but I am the junior Senator according to every law book in the nation.”
The ructions over Mr Blagojevich may have accelerated the removal of Bill Richardson from Mr Obama’s list of Cabinet appointees on Sunday. The New Mexico Governor said that he would not accept the position of commerce secretary because of a pending federal investigation into contracts awarded by his state to a firm that had given him political donations.
Yesterday Mr Richardson said that the investigation would ultimately clear his administration of any wrong-doing, adding that he had not been pushed out by Mr Obama but had withdrawn because it was “the right thing to do”.
— Barack Obama is preparing to fill one of the last key posts in his administration by appointing Leon Panetta as director of the Central Intelligence Agency (Tom Baldwin writes).
The nomination of the veteran former congressman and White House chief of staff under Bill Clinton reflects the difficulty that Mr Obama has encountered in finding a candidate untainted by controversy over the interrogation techniques and wiretapping conducted by the CIA under President Bush.
Mr Panetta, 70, has little direct experience of intelligence. Others thought to have been lined up for the job, such as John Brennan, former director of the National Counterterrorism Centre, had to withdraw from consideration after criticism from liberal activists over his role in the agency’s detention and interrogation programme.

Principles Of Barack Obama



1. A challenging, clearly-defined mission.



Win the Democratic nomination. Ok, that’s obvious. But in November of 2006, Obama had a handful of wealthy Jewish donors from Chicago ready to raise money, a few Democratic strategy types who stood ready to put a campaign together, and not much of anything else. The challenge was immense, and the folks who joined the Obama campaign early on — this was when Hillary Clinton was the frontrunner — came aboard because they believed in Obama the challenge, not because they expected glory or material rewards. Salaries weren’t competitive with the Clinton campaign’s either. Obama attracted a large number of ideological Democrats who either had reason to dislike the Clintonian influence over the party or who believed that Obama stood at the crossroads between history and hope.



2. Clear lines of authority, with budget power appropriately vested in the campaign manager.



David Plouffe was named campaign manager and given the portfolio of essentially building an airplane as it was speeding down the runway. Plouffe’s authority did not derive from his personal relationship with Barack Obama; indeed, Plouffe really didn’t interact much with Obama before the campaign. Instead, it derived from the decisions he made that Obama later ratified. A corollary: Obama’s best friend, Marty Nesbitt, was named campaign treasurer. That meant that Nesbitt, too, had oversight functions about spending and could make sure that Obama’s personal values were reflected in the decisions made by the campaign.
David Axelrod would handle strategy, always a kind of messy and intrusive portfolio, but the strategy was pretty clear from the start: this is a change election, and Obama’s the change agent.
Robert Gibbs would handle the press; and handle is a good word, because Obama’s relationship with the press has been fascinating as it has evolved.
Their subordinates were generally given tasks and clear lines of authority.
3. The tone from the top.



Much has been written about Plouffe’s preternatural unflappability, but his attitude helps confirm a basic principle of psychology: when the boss is freaked, employees get freaked. When the boss is calm, employees tend to remain calm.
But there’s Obama’s tone, too. Generally happy. “No drama.” That’s made clear to new employees, who feel the presence of the dictum as they go about their work. Drama disappoints Obama. No one wants to disappoint Obama. So — if there are conflicts — staffers are advised to work them out by themselves. A social cuing effect helps to cement the bond here; employees see that everyone else is getting along and feel pressure to get along, too.



4. Protecting Obama’s public image at all costs



This one’s also obvious, but it has been a priority from day one. The type of people drawn to the campaign are the type of people who would be angry at themselves if they somehow distorted the carefully crafted image that Obama and guru Gibbs et. al. had worked to create.



5. The personality cult



Not meant as an insult or a reference to messianic fervor; I mean more a reflection of Obama’s personality. Obama is an occasionally fastidious perfectionist. He expects a high level of professional integrity from his staff; he expects a higher level of execution. When things go wrong, Obama doesn’t just leave the aftermath to his subordinates, he actively helps to clean it up.
6. Decisions made quickly and decisively.



Occasionally, Obama temporizes. But just as often, he endorses quick, clear decision-making.



7. The freedom to do things differently.



Let the Clintons run their campaign the traditional way. Obama had nothing to lose and everything to gain, and so his campaign could experiment; they were trying to accomplish something that no challenger had every before accomplished, so they could afford to try new things, to throw out the old rulebooks, to ignore established habits of mind, and take some risks.”

About Obama




The Essentials
Barack is married to Michelle Robinson, whom he met in 1988 while working at a law firm. They were married in 1992 and have two daughters: Malia, born in 1999, and Sasha, born in 2001.

Born:
August 4, 1961

Famous For:
Candidate for Democratic Party's 2008 presidential nomination.
Key Accomplishments: Graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law. Fifth African-American senator in U.S. history. His book, The Audacity of Hope, has been at or near the top of the New York Times Best Seller List since its publication in October, 2006.

Significant Quote:
"If you're walking down the right path and you're willing to keep walking, eventually you'll make progress."
Fun Quote:
"That's silly talk... Talk to my wife. She'll tell me I need to learn to just put my socks on the hamper."

Biography Of Barack Obama




Barack Obama Biography

Barack Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, to Barack Obama, Sr. and Ann Dunham. His parents met while attending the University of Hawaii, where his father was enrolled as a foreign student. His mother was from heartland-of-the-U.S. Kansas, and his father from Kenya. Barack's parents eventually divorced, and after his mother remarried, he lived in Indonesia for a time before returning to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. He later moved to New York, where he graduated from Columbia University in 1983.
True to the values of empathy and service that his mother instilled in him, Barack put law school on hold after college and moved to Chicago, where he became a community organizer with a church-based group that was dedicated to improving living conditions in poor neighborhoods. For example, helping poor people work with service agencies to get their plumbing and heating fixed and to find jobs for unemployed. It was here that he realized it would take changes in our laws and politics to truly improve the lives of the people in these impoverished neighborhoods. A little known but impressive fact is that when Barack applied to Harvard Law School, he did not even indicate his race on his Harvard application.
Barack earned his law degree from Harvard in 1991, where he became the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review. He then returned to Chicago to practice as a civil rights lawyer and teach constitutional law. His advocacy work led him to run for the Illinois State Senate, where he served for eight years beginning in 1996. While in the Illinois State Senate, Barack served as chairman of the Public Health and Welfare Committee. In 2004, well into his U.S. Senate campaign, Barack wrote and delivered the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston, and became a rising star in U.S. politics. A few months later, he was elected to the U.S. Senate with a landslide 70% of the vote. Four months into his senate career, Time magazine named him "one of the world's most influential people," calling him "one of the most admired politicians in America." Barack formally announced his candidacy for the 2008 presidential election in Springfield, Illinois on February 10, 2007.


Barack is also an accomplished author. His 1995 book, Dreams from My Father, is a memoir of his youth and early career. The book was reprinted in 2004 with a new preface and an annex containing the text of his 2004 Democratic Convention keynote speech. The audio book edition earned Barack the 2006 Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album.
In December 2004, Barack signed a contract to write three more books. The first, The Audacity of Hope, was published in October 2006. The book has remained at or near the top of the New York Times Best Seller list since its publication. It was also the theme of his 2004 keynote address. The second book will be a children's book to be co-written with his wife Michelle and their two daughters, with profits going to charity. The content of the third book has yet to be announced.
In August 2008, Barack was nominated by the Democratic party as their candidate to be President of the United States. Barack selected long-time and well-respected U.S. Senator Joe Biden as his running mate.